Published on: December 23, 2025

RIGHT TO DISCONNECT

RIGHT TO DISCONNECT

NEWS

A Right to Disconnect Bill has been introduced in Parliament as a Private Member’s Bill, seeking to give employees the right to not respond to work-related digital communication beyond prescribed working hours. The proposal gains significance amid increasing work-from-home practices and India’s recent shift to the four labour codes.

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT

  • Digital technologies have blurred boundaries between work and personal life.
  • Indian labour law traditionally regulates work through time-based constructs such as working hours and overtime.
  • The Bill emerges against the backdrop of:
    • Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020
    • Employer control increasingly exercised through emails, calls, and messaging apps.

KEY PROVISIONS OF THE BILL

  • Grants employees the right to ignore work-related calls, emails, and messages beyond official working hours.
  • Aims to curb after-hours employer intrusion into personal time.
  • Intended to improve work-life balance and mental well-being.

MAJOR LEGAL AMBIGUITIES

Undefined Concept of ‘Work’

  • The Bill does not clarify whether after-hours digital engagement qualifies as “work”.
  • It remains unclear whether such communication:
    • Counts towards working time
    • Attracts overtime compensation
  • This creates a gap between communication regulation and working time regulation.

Interaction with Labour Codes

  • The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code continues to govern:
    • Daily and weekly working hours
    • Overtime limits
  • The Bill does not integrate digital labour into this framework, making the right appear more normative than enforceable.

COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL PRACTICES

  • European Union: Employer control determines working time, including standby and on-call periods.
  • France: Distinguishes working time and rest time; digital communication regulated via collective bargaining.
  • Germany: Enforces strict rest periods and limits on employer contact.
  • These models address a core question: When does an employee’s time belong to the employer?

CONSTITUTIONAL DIMENSION

  • The right has a clear linkage with Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty), especially individual autonomy.
  • However, the Bill:
    • Does not acknowledge this constitutional basis
    • Leaves unclear whether the right is purely statutory or constitutionally grounded