Published on: December 25, 2025

RHINO DEHORNING EMERGES AS EFFECTIVE ANTI-POACHING STRATEGY: STUDY

RHINO DEHORNING EMERGES AS EFFECTIVE ANTI-POACHING STRATEGY: STUDY

NEWS – A recent international study published in Science reports that dehorning rhinoceroses led to a sharp decline in poaching in African wildlife reserves, offering evidence-based support for a controversial conservation strategy.

HIGHLIGHTS

Background: Rhino Poaching Crisis

  • As of 2024, fewer than 28,000 rhinos remain globally (all five species combined).
  • Poaching for horns remains the primary threat.
  • In the Greater Kruger landscape (South Africa):
    • 1,985 rhinos lost between 2017–2023
    • Despite $74 million spent on patrols, AI cameras, drones, and tracking dogs.
  • Rhino horn is trafficked for:
    • Illegal luxury markets
    • Traditional medicine claims (especially in China & Vietnam), despite no scientific basis.
  • Illegal trade value (2012–2022): $874 million–$1.13 billion.

What is Rhino Dehorning?

  • Humane, non-lethal process:
    • Rhinos are sedated and blindfolded.
    • 90–93% of horn removed above the germinal layer.
    • Horn regrows naturally.
  • Horn is made of keratin (same as hair and nails).

Key Findings of the Study

  • Data analysed:
    • 11 reserves, 2017–2023
    • 2,284 rhinos dehorned across 8 reserves.
  • Results:
    • 75% reduction in poaching compared to pre-dehorning levels.
    • 78% drop in reserves that implemented abrupt dehorning (1–2 months).
    • 95% lower poaching risk for dehorned rhinos vs intact ones.
  • Cost-effectiveness:
    • Achieved with just 1.2% of total anti-poaching budgets.
  • Methodology:
    • Hierarchical Bayesian regression modelling.

Limits of Conventional Anti-Poaching

  • Detection and arrests alone showed limited deterrence.
  • Reasons:
    • Corruption and trafficking networks.
    • Weak criminal justice systems enabling repeat offences.

Indian Context & Counterpoint

  • Kaziranga National Park:
    • Poaching reduced to 1–2 rhinos in recent years.
    • Success attributed to:
      • Smart patrolling
      • Community participation
  • Experts argue dehorning may not be necessary where governance and local engagement are strong.

Way Forward

  • Dehorning is not a silver bullet—poachers may still kill for horn remnants.
  • However, it is:
    • Evidence-backed
    • Cost-effective
    • Useful as part of a mixed conservation strategy.
  • Emphasis needed on:
    • Ranger welfare and training
    • Community inclusion
    • Targeting demand-side illegal markets